4.6 Article

Photocatalytic hydrogen production and storage in carbon nanotubes: a first-principles study

Journal

RSC ADVANCES
Volume 12, Issue 27, Pages 17029-17035

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2ra02349k

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21833004]
  2. Basic Research Project of Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2018ZB0751]
  3. Taishan Scholar Program of Shandong Province

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Based on first-principles calculations, this study proposed an integral strategy for the production and storage of hydrogen in carbon nanotubes via photocatalytic processes. The core-shell structure, formed by placing a carbon nitride nanowire inside a carbon nanotube, enables effective water splitting and hydrogen generation. The high hydrogen storage capacity of carbon nanotubes makes this core-shell structure a promising candidate system for photocatalytic water splitting and safe hydrogen storage.
As it is a promising clean energy source, the production and storage of hydrogen are crucial techniques. Here, based on first-principles calculations, we proposed an integral strategy for the production and storage of hydrogen in carbon nanotubes via photocatalytic processes. We considered a core-shell structure formed by placing a carbon nitride nanowire inside a carbon nanotube to achieve this goal. Photo-generated holes on the carbon nanotube surface promote water splitting. Driven by intrinsic electrostatic field in the core-shell structures, protons produced by water splitting penetrate the carbon nanotube and react with photo-generated electrons on the carbon nitride nanowire to produce hydrogen molecules in the carbon nanotube. Because carbon nanotubes have high hydrogen storage capacity, this core-shell structure can serve as a candidate system for photocatalytic water splitting and safe hydrogen storage.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available