4.7 Article

Success of post-fire plant recovery strategies varies with shifting fire seasonality

Journal

COMMUNICATIONS EARTH & ENVIRONMENT
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s43247-022-00453-2

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council (ARC) Linkage Grant [LP180100741]
  2. New South Wales Government's Department of Planning, Industry Environment

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A global meta-analysis showed that fires occurring outside of the historical fire season have varying impacts on post-fire recovery of plants. Fires outside of the historical fire season may decrease recruitment of obligate seeding plants, but generally increase survival of resprouting species.
Post-fire recovery success after fires that occur outside of the historical fire season varies between fire response traits, which may impact long term ecosystem composition under changing fire regimes, according to a global systematic meta-analysis. Wildfires are increasing in size and severity and fire seasons are lengthening, largely driven by climate and land-use change. Many plant species from fire-prone ecosystems are adapted to specific fire regimes corresponding to historical conditions and shifts beyond these bounds may have severe impacts on vegetation recovery and long-term species persistence. Here, we conduct a meta-analysis of field-based studies across different vegetation types and climate regions to investigate how post-fire plant recruitment, reproduction and survival are affected by fires that occur outside of the historical fire season. We find that fires outside of the historical fire season may lead to decreased post-fire recruitment, particularly in obligate seeding species. Conversely, we find a general increase in post-fire survival in resprouting species. Our results highlight the trade-offs that exist when considering the effects of changes in the seasonal timing of fire, an already present aspect of climate-related fire regime change.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available