Framing and the formation of global health priorities

Health issues vary in the amount of attention and resources they receive from global health organisations and national governments. How issues are framed could shape differences in levels of priority. We reviewed scholarship on global health policy making to examine the role of framing in shaping global health priorities. The review provides evidence of the influence of three framing processes???securitisation, moralisation, and technification. Securitisation refers to an issue???s framing as an existential threat, moralisation as an ethical imperative, and technification as a wise investment that science can solve. These framing processes concern more than how issues are portrayed publicly. They are socio-political processes, characterised by contestation among actors in civil society, government, international organisations, foundations, and research institutions. These actors deploy various forms of power to advance particular frames as a means of securing attention and resources for the issues that concern them. The ascription of an issue as a security concern, an ethical imperative, or a wise investment is historically contingent: it is not inevitable that any given issue will be framed in one or more of these ways. A health issue???s inherent characteristics???such as the lethality of a pathogen that causes it???also shape these ascriptions, but do not fully determine them. Although commonly facing resistance, global health elites often determine which frames prevail, raising questions about the legitimacy of priority-setting processes. We draw on the review to offer ideas on how to make these processes fairer than they are at present, including a call for democratic representation even as necessary space is preserved for elite expertise.

Automated summary

Health issues receive varying attention and resources from global health organizations and national governments. The way these issues are framed can affect their priority levels. A review of global health policy making reveals the influence of framing processes such as securitization, moralization, and technification. These processes involve socio-political contestation among different actors and are not just about public portrayal. The ascription of an issue as a security concern, an ethical imperative, or a wise investment is not inevitable and can be influenced by various factors.