4.2 Article

Mapping training needs for dissemination and implementation research: lessons from a synthesis of existing D&I research training programs

Journal

TRANSLATIONAL BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE
Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages 593-601

Publisher

SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG
DOI: 10.1007/s13142-016-0399-3

Keywords

Dissemination research; Implementation research; Training; Research capacity

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health Mentored Training for Dissemination and Implementation Research in Cancer Program (MT-DIRC) [5R25CA171994-02]
  2. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) [1P30DK092950]
  3. Dissemination and Implementation Research Core of Washington University in St. Louis' Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences [UL1 TR000448]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

With recent growth in the field of dissemination and implementation (D&I) research, multiple training programs have been developed to build capacity, including summer training institutes, graduate courses, degree programs, workshops, and conferences. While opportunities for D&I research training have expanded, course organizers acknowledge that available slots are insufficient to meet demand within the scientific and practitioner community. In addition, individual programs have struggled to best fit various needs of trainees, sometimes splitting coursework between specific D&I content and more introductory grant writing material. This article, stemming from a 2013 NIH workshop, reviews experiences across multiple training programs to align training needs, career stage and role, and availability of programs. We briefly review D&I needs and opportunities by career stage and role, discuss variations among existing training programs in format, mentoring relationships, and other characteristics, identify challenges of mapping needs of trainees to programs, and present recommendations for future D&I research training.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available