4.7 Article

Quark-diquark potential and diquark mass from lattice QCD

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 105, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.105.074510

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. MEXT
  2. JICFuS
  3. JSPS KAKENHI [JP21K03535]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study proposes a new application of lattice QCD to calculate the quark-diquark potential, diquark mass, and quark mass. The HAL QCD method is used to calculate the charm-diquark potential and suggests that the weakening of the attraction may be attributed to the diquark size effect.
We propose a new application of lattice QCD to calculate the quark-diquark potential, diquark mass, and quark mass required for the diquark model. As a concrete example, we consider the A c baryon and treat it as a charm-diquark (c-[ud]) two-body bound state. We extend the HAL QCD method to calculate the charm-diquark potential, which reproduces the equal-time Nambu-Bethe-Salpeter wave function of the S-wave state [Lambda(c) (1/2(+))]. The diquark mass is determined so as to reproduce the difference between the S-wave and the spin-orbit averaged P-wave energies, i.e., the difference between the Lambda(c) (1/2(+)) level and the average of the Lambda(c) (1/2(-))) and the Lambda(c) (3/2(-)) levels. Numerical calculations are performed on a 32(3) x 64 lattice with lattice spacing of a similar or equal to 0.0907 fm and the pion mass of m(pi) similar or equal to 700 MeV. Our charm-diquark potential is given by the Coulomb + linear (Cornell) potential, where the long range behavior is consistent with the charm-anticharm potential, while the Coulomb attraction is considerably smaller. This weakening of the attraction may be attributed to the diquark size effect. The obtained diquark mass is m(D) = 1.273(44) GeV. Our diquark mass lies slightly above the conventional estimates, namely the rho meson mass and twice the constituent quark mass 2m(N)/3.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available