3.9 Article

Japanese Maxillary First Molar Root Canal Morphology: An Ultrastructural Study Using Micro-Computed Tomography

Journal

JOURNAL OF HARD TISSUE BIOLOGY
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages 109-114

Publisher

JOURNAL HARD TISSUE BIOLOGY

Keywords

Root canal morphology; Accessory canal; Maxillary first molar; Mesiobuccal (MB) root; Micro-computed tomography (CT)

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [21K09961, 18K09643]
  2. Multidisciplinary Research Center for Jaw Disease (MRCJD)
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21K09961, 18K09643] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present study used ultra-high-resolution micro-CT to investigate the classification of root canal morphologies and the incidence of accessory canals in maxillary molars. The study found a high incidence of accessory canals, even in different types of root canals.
The present study used ultra-high-resolution micro-computed tomography (CT) to clarify the classification of root canal morphologies and the incidence of accessory canals in the maxillary first molar mesiobuccal (MB) root. Aspects of the relationship with root canal reinfection during or after molar endodontic treatment were also investigated. Molar three-dimensional structure, pulp cavity, and accessory canals were examined on micro-CT images of 100 Japanese maxillary first molars from the collection at the Department of Anatomy, Tokyo Dental College. The most common Vertucci's classification of the main root canal of the Japanese maxillary first molar mesial root canal was Type I, followed by Type V. Accessory canal incidence was 75.0%, which was higher than previously reported; however, the majority of such canals were within the apical 3 mm. Many accessory canals were observed even with the single canals of Type I, suggesting that the existence of accessory canals should always be considered even if diagnostic imaging clearly shows a Type I classification.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available