4.6 Article

Benchmarking of the Fock-space coupled-cluster method and uncertainty estimation: Magnetic hyperfine interaction in the excited state of BaF

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW A
Volume 105, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.105.052811

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Center for Information Technology of the University of Groningen
  2. Dutch Research Council (NWO) [VI.Vidi.192.088]
  3. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) [EEDM-166]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigated the performance of the relativistic multireference Fock-space coupled-cluster method for predicting molecular hyperfine structure constants and estimated the associated uncertainties through computational studies. The F-19 HFS constant in the ground and excited states of BaF was considered, and the theoretical values showed good overall agreement with recent experimental results within the calculated uncertainties. This work demonstrates the predictive power of the FSCC method and the reliability of the established uncertainty estimates, which is crucial when comparing calculated properties to experiments directly.
We present an investigation of the performance of the relativistic multireference Fock-space coupled-cluster (FSCC) method for predicting molecular hyperfine structure (HFS) constants, including a thorough computational study to estimate the associated uncertainties. In particular, we considered the F-19 HFS constant in the ground and excited states of BaF. The ab initio values were compared to the recent experimental results, and good overall agreement within the theoretical uncertainties was found. This work demonstrates the predictive power of the FSCC method and the reliability of the established uncertainty estimates, which can be crucial in cases where the calculated property cannot be directly compared to experiment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available