4.7 Article

Observing the Migdal effect from nuclear recoils of neutral particles with liquid xenon and argon detectors

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 105, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.105.096015

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council through the ARC Centre of Excellence for Dark Matter Particle Physics [CE200100008]
  2. National Science Foundation [PHY-1820801, PHY-1748958, PHY-2112803]
  3. Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to make a first measurement and test the feasibility of the Migdal effect, as well as calibrate the experimental response to a potential dark matter signal. Xenon and argon are used as observation targets, and proof-of-concept calculations are carried out for low-energy neutron and potential neutrino sources.
In recent years, dark matter direct detection experiments have spurred interest in the Migdal effect, where it is employed to extend their sensitivity to lower dark matter masses. Given the lack of observation of the Migdal effect, the calculation of the signal is subject to large theoretical uncertainties. It is therefore desirable to attempt a first measurement of the Migdal effect, and to test the theoretical predictions of the Migdal effect for the calibration of the experimental response to a potential dark matter signal. In this work, we explore the feasibility of observing the Migdal effect in xenon and argon. We carry out proof-of-concept calculations for low-energy neutrons from a filtered source, and using a reactor, the Spallation Neutron Source, or 51Cr as potential neutrino sources. We perform a detector simulation for the xenon target and find that, with available technology, the low-energy neutron source is the most promising, requiring only a modest neutron flux, detector size, and exposure period.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available