4.4 Article

How can we optimize the long-term outcome in children with intracranial cavernous malformations? A single-center experience of 61 cases

Journal

NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW
Volume 45, Issue 5, Pages 3299-3313

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10143-022-01823-2

Keywords

Pediatric cavernous malformation; Brainstem; Lobar; Conservative; Seizures

Funding

  1. Medical University of Vienna

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of this study is to provide a treatment algorithm for pediatric patients with intracranial cavernous malformations (CMs) based on the authors' experience. The study retrospectively evaluated pediatric patients under the age of 18 who were treated either surgically or conservatively between 1982 and 2019. The results showed that surgical treatment was associated with larger lesions and higher seizure prevalence in patients with lobar CMs, while a more aggressive approach was associated with higher modified Rankin scale scores in patients with deep CMs. The study suggests a treatment algorithm based on lesion location and size, symptom burden, epilepsy workup, and clinical course.
The objective is to provide a treatment algorithm for pediatric patients with intracranial cavernous malformations (CMs) based on our experience. Patients < 18 years of age who were treated either surgically or conservatively at the authors' institution between 1982 and 2019 were retrospectively evaluated. A total of 61 pediatric patients were treated at the authors' institution: 39 with lobar CMs; 18 with deep CMs, including 12 in the brainstem and 6 in the basal ganglia; and 4 with CMs in the cerebellar hemispheres. Forty-two patients underwent surgery, and 19 were treated conservatively. The median follow-up time was 65 months (1-356 months). In surgically treated patients, lesions were larger (2.4 cm vs 0.9 cm, p < 0.001). In patients with lobar CMs, seizures were more common (72% vs 21%, p = 0.003) in the surgery group than in conservatively managed patients. In deep CMs, modified Rankin scale (mRS) was higher (4 vs 1, p = 0.003) in the surgery group than in conservatively treated patients. At the time of last follow-up, no differences in Wieser outcome class I were seen (86% vs 67%) in lobar CMs, and mRS scores had aligned between the treatment groups in deep CMs (1 vs 0). We encountered no new permanent neurological deficit at time of last follow-up. We propose a treatment algorithm according to lesion location and size, burden of symptoms, epilepsy workup, and further clinical course during observation. A conservative management is safe in pediatric patients with asymptomatic CMs. Gross total resection should be the aim in patients with symptomatic lobar CMs. A less aggressive approach with subtotal resection, when required to prevent neurological compromise, sustainably improves neurological outcome in patients with deep CMs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available