4.3 Article

The relationship between estimated glucose disposal rate and bone turnover markers in type 2 diabetes mellitus

Journal

ENDOCRINE
Volume 77, Issue 2, Pages 242-251

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12020-022-03090-z

Keywords

eGDR; Insulin resistance; Bone turnover; T2DM

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study is the first to demonstrate a positive correlation between estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR) and bone turnover markers in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This correlation is particularly significant in male patients.
Purpose To investigate the relationship between estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR) and bone turnover markers in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Materials and methods This is a cross-sectional study, which recruited 549 patients with T2DM. The eGDRs of patients were calculated based on the presence of hypertension, glycated hemoglobin, and body mass index. All patients were divided into high-eGDR group and low-eGDR group using the median of eGDR as the boundary. The patients were further divided into two subgroups: males and postmenopausal females. Results The lower the eGDR, the more severe was insulin resistance. The levels of osteocalcin (OC), type I collagen carboxyl-terminal peptide (beta-CTX), and type I procollagen amino-terminal peptide (PINP) were significantly lower in the low-eGDR group than those in the high-eGDR group. The eGDR was positively correlated with OC, beta-CTX, and PINP in all patients, and in the male subgroups. In the postmenopausal female subgroup, there was no correlation between eGDR and OC, beta-CTX, or PINP. In addition, this positive correlation remained after adjusting for other factors in multilinear regression analysis. Conclusion Our study was the first to demonstrate that eGDR is positively correlated with bone turnover markers in patients with T2DM. This correlation was observed among the male patients with T2DM but not among postmenopausal female patients with T2DM.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available