4.8 Review

Construction and application of base-stable MOFs: a critical review

Journal

CHEMICAL SOCIETY REVIEWS
Volume 51, Issue 15, Pages 6417-6441

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1cs00891a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22038001, 21771012, 51621003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are porous crystalline materials made up of organic ligands and metal ions/clusters. Their unique advantages have attracted increasing attention in recent years, showing great potential in various applications. In alkaline operational environments, the stability of MOFs against bases is crucial for achieving high performance and long cycling life. Therefore, the development of base-stable MOFs has become a critical research direction in this field.
Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are a new class of porous crystalline materials constructed from organic ligands and metal ions/clusters. Owing to their unique advantages, they have attracted more and more attention in recent years and numerous studies have revealed their great potential in various applications. Many important applications of MOFs inevitably involve harsh alkaline operational environments. To achieve high performance and long cycling life in these applications, high stability of MOFs against bases is necessary. Therefore, the construction of base-stable MOFs has become a critical research direction in the MOF field. This review gives a historic summary of the development of base-stable MOFs in the last few years. The key factors that can determine the robustness of MOFs under basic conditions are analyzed. We also demonstrate the exciting achievements that have been made by utilizing base-stable MOFs in different applications. In the end, we discuss major challenges for the further development of base-stable MOFs. Some possible methods to address these problems are presented.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available