4.7 Article

A pure hadronic model description of the observed neutrino emission from the tidal disruption event AT2019dsg

Journal

EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL C
Volume 82, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10486-8

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. SERB (DST), Government of India [PDF/2021/001514]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The IceCube Neutrino Observatory recently detected the neutrino event IceCube-170922A from the radio-emitting tidal disruption event (TDE) named AT2019dsg, suggesting it as a potential source of high-energy cosmic rays. This study examines the possibility of describing IceCube-170922A and the broadband electromagnetic emission from the same source using a pure hadronic emission model, and finds that it can successfully explain the observations without exceeding the flux upper limits imposed by other telescopes.
Recently, the IceCube Neutrino Observatory has detected the neutrino event IceCube-170922A from the radio-emitting tidal disruption event (TDE) named AT2019dsg, indicating to be one of the most likely sources of high-energy cosmic rays. So far, the photo-hadronic interaction is considered in the literature to interpret neutrino emission from AT2019dsg. Here, we examine whether the IceCube-170922A along with the broadband electromagnetic emission from the source can also be described by a pure hadronic emission employing the proton blazar inspired (PBI) model, which takes into account the non-relativistic protons that emerge under the charge neutrality situation of the blazar jet and thus offers sufficient target matter for pp interactions with shock-accelerated protons. Our findings show that the PBI model is able to consistently describe the IceCube observations on AT2019dsg and the broadband spectrum of the source without exceeding the observed X-ray and gamma-ray flux upper limits imposed by the XMM-Newton and Fermi-LAT telescopes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available