4.2 Article

Greening extractivism: Environmental discourses and resource governance in the 'Lithium Triangle'

Journal

ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING E-NATURE AND SPACE
Volume 5, Issue 2, Pages 787-809

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/25148486211006345

Keywords

Climate change; environmental conflicts; green extractivism; political ecology; resource governance

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation
  2. International Institute of Social Studies, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article explores the environmental conflicts associated with lithium mining in Latin America's "Lithium Triangle", and analyzes the discursive strategies used by institutional actors to promote and accept lithium extraction in the region. The study findings reveal that these strategies aim to conceal the social and ecological costs of lithium production while associating mining with high-tech industries, green jobs, and climate-friendly extraction.
The lithium extractive industry is expanding, as technological and economic shifts associated with climate change mitigation goals drive global demand for lithium-ion batteries. This article explores the case of the 'Lithium Triangle', a region of Latin America (spanning Bolivia, Chile and Argentina) that contains the world's largest reserves, and where environmental conflicts associated with lithium mining have proliferated. Emphasising the centrality of discourse in resource governance, we analyse the discursive strategies employed by institutional actors seeking to promote and render acceptable lithium extraction in the region. We argue that such strategies reproduce imaginaries of prosperity and modernisation long attached to oil and mineral wealth, while at the same time introducing a novel association of mining with high-tech industries, 'green jobs' and 'climate-friendly' extraction, seeking to obscure the social and ecological costs of lithium production. This inaugurates an era of 'green extractivism', whereby intensive resource exploitation is framed not only as compatible with climate change, but indeed as necessary to its mitigation. Our findings contribute to ongoing conversations regarding post-fossil fuel 'transitions', by highlighting the contradictory character of mitigation strategies that rely on mineral-intensive development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available