4.2 Review

Advances in stable isotope labeling: dynamic labeling for spatial and temporal proteomic analysis

Journal

MOLECULAR OMICS
Volume 18, Issue 7, Pages 579-590

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2mo00077f

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The SILAC technique in proteomics uses stable isotope labeling in cell culture to differentiate and quantify unlabeled and labeled cells. The pulsed SILAC technique provides a new quantitative dimension for temporal analysis in proteomics. These innovative techniques have contributed to the development of various SILAC-based temporal and spatial labeling applications.
The field of proteomics is continually improving, requiring the development of new quantitative methods. Stable isotope labeling in cell culture (SILAC) is a metabolic labeling technique originating in the early 2000s. By incorporating isotopically labeled amino acids into the media used for cell culture, unlabeled versus labeled cells can be differentiated by the mass spectrometer. Traditional SILAC labeling has been expanded to pulsed applications allowing for a new quantitative dimension of proteomics - temporal analysis. The complete introduction of Heavy SILAC labeling chased with surplus unlabeled medium mimics traditional pulse-chase experiments and allows for the loss of heavy signal to track proteomic changes over time. In a similar fashion, pulsed SILAC (pSILAC) monitors the initial incorporation of a heavy label across a period of time, which allows for the rate of protein label integration to be assessed. These innovative techniques have aided in inspiring numerous SILAC-based temporal and spatial labeling applications, including super SILAC, spike-in SILAC, spatial SILAC, and a revival in label multiplexing. This review reflects upon the evolution of SILAC and the pulsed SILAC application, introduces advances in SILAC labeling, and proposes future perspectives for this novel and exciting field.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available