4.6 Article

Cationic metal-organic frameworks constructed from a trigonal imidazole-containing ligand for the removal of Cr2O72- in water

Journal

NEW JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY
Volume 46, Issue 27, Pages 12994-13000

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2nj01567f

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21401099, 21671099, 91753121]
  2. Shenzhen Basic Research Program [JCYJ20180508182240106]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cationic metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have recently gained attention for their potential in treating wastewater containing toxic anions. In this study, two novel cationic MOFs were constructed using a neutral imidazole-containing ligand. The structures and properties of the MOFs were analyzed, and it was found that one of the MOFs exhibited high efficiency and recyclability in adsorbing Cr2O72-.
Recently, cationic metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have drawn considerable attention in the treatment of wastewater containing toxic anions via anion exchange due to the presence of exchangeable anions in their pores. In this work, we employed the neutral imidazole-containing ligand tris(4-(1H-imidazol-1-yl)phenyl)amine (tipa) to construct two novel cationic MOFs, {[Ag-3(tipa)(2)](4)center dot[Ag(tipa)]center dot(NO3)(13)center dot 2CH(3)CN center dot 20H(2)O} (1) and {[Zn-12(H2O)(12)(tipa)(12)(SiF6)(9)]center dot(SiF6)(2)center dot(OH)(2)center dot 7CH(3)CN center dot 64H(2)O} (2). Structural analysis revealed that complex 1 possessed 3D frameworks constructed from intercrossing 2D wavelike grids and highly disordered 1D chains with free NO3- in the channels, while 2 exhibited 3D frameworks composed of rotaxane-like subunits with free SiF62- and OH- anions filled in the channels. Subsequently, the anion-exchange properties of the two MOFs were examined with Cr2O72-, and the results suggest that only compound 1 exhibited adsorption capacity for Cr2O72- with high efficiency and recyclability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available