4.6 Article

Measurement-based logical qubit entanglement purification

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW A
Volume 105, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.105.062418

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11974189, 12175106]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a new measurement-based logical qubit entanglement purification protocol (MBLEPP) is proposed, which can tolerate photon loss and errors from imperfect QND. It combines the advantages of MBEPP and quantum error correction code, and may have potential applications in long-distance quantum communication.
Entanglement purification is the distilling of high-quality entanglement from low-quality entanglement and is a key element in the quantum repeater. As a new branch of entanglement purification, the measurement-based entanglement purification protocol (MBEPP) only requires one to perform the Bell state measurement to couple resource states with noisy pairs, and it tolerates more local noise than the conventional purification protocols. Existing MBEPPs usually focus on physical qubit entanglement. In this paper, we propose a measurement-based logical qubit entanglement purification protocol (MBLEPP) with quantum nondemolition detection (QND), where the qubit is encoded in the quantum parity code. The results show that this MBLEPP can also work with photon loss under the conditions that each block of the logical Bell state measurement contains at least one physical qubit, that at least one of the blocks is intact, and that the entanglement exists between all blocks. Moreover, we also consider the MBLEPP with imperfect QND. We show that below a certain QND error threshold, this MBLEPP can still work. In this way, this MBLEPP not only obtains high-fidelity entanglement but also tolerates photon loss and the error from imperfect QND. This MBLEPP combines the benefits of the MBEPP and quantum error correction code and may have potential application in long-distance quantum communication.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available