4.5 Article

Dense-Structured Network Based Bearing Remaining Useful Life Prediction System

Journal

CMES-COMPUTER MODELING IN ENGINEERING & SCIENCES
Volume 133, Issue 1, Pages 133-151

Publisher

TECH SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.32604/cmes.2022.020350

Keywords

Bearing; neural network; remaining useful life prediction; machine learning

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [MOST 110-2218-E-194-010]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study focuses on developing an effective method for predicting the remaining useful life of bearings to prevent machine damage and human accidents. By exploring neural network models and analyzing data, the study successfully predicts the remaining useful life with high accuracy. The proposed method is proven to be superior through a comparison with traditional models.
This work is focused on developing an effective method for bearing remaining useful life predictions. The method is useful in accurately predicting the remaining useful life of bearings so that machine damage, production outage, and human accidents caused by unexpected bearing failure can be prevented. This study uses the bearing dataset provided by FEMTO-ST Institute, Besan??on, France. This study starts with the exploration of neural networks, based on which the biaxial vibration signals are modeled and analyzed. This paper introduces pre-processing of bearing vibration signals, neural network model training and adjustment of training data. The model is trained by optimizing model parameters and verifying its performance through cross-validation. The proposed model???s superiority is also confirmed through a comparison with other traditional models. In this study, the neural network model is trained with various types of bearing data and can successfully predict the remaining useful life. The algorithm proposed in this study achieves a prediction accuracy of coefficient of determination as high as 0.99.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available