4.7 Article

Impacts of active satellite sensors' low-level cloud detection limitations on cloud radiative forcing in the Arctic

Journal

ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
Volume 22, Issue 12, Pages 8151-8173

Publisher

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/acp-22-8151-2022

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Environmental Satellite, Data, and Information Service

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By quantifying the limitations in cloud detection, this study reveals the significant impact of cloud detection uncertainties on radiation flux in the Arctic region.
Previous studies revealed that satellites sensors with the best detection capability identify 25 %-40 % and 0 %-25 % fewer clouds below 0.5 and between 0.5-1.0 km, respectively, over the Arctic. Quantifying the impacts of cloud detection limitations on the radiation flux are critical especially over the Arctic Ocean considering the dramatic changes in Arctic sea ice. In this study, the proxies of the space-based radar, CloudSat, and lidar, CALIPSO (Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations), cloud masks are derived based on simulated radar reflectivity with QuickBeam and cloud optical thickness using retrieved cloud properties from surface-based radar and lidar during the Surface Heat Budget of the Arctic Ocean (SHEBA) experiment. Limitations in low-level cloud detection by the space-based active sensors, and the impact of these limitations on the radiation fluxes at the surface and the top of the atmosphere (TOA), are estimated with radiative transfer model Streamer. The results show that the combined CloudSat and CALIPSO product generally detects all clouds above 1 km, while detecting 25 % (9 %) fewer in absolute values below 600 m (600 m to 1 km) than surface observations. These detection limitations lead to uncertainties in the monthly mean cloud radiative forcing (CRF), with maximum absolute monthly mean values of 2.5 and 3.4 Wm(-2) at the surface and TOA, respectively. Cloud information from only CALIPSO or CloudSat lead to larger cloud detection differences compared to the surface observations and larger CRF uncertainties with absolute monthly means larger than 10.0 Wm(-2) at the surface and TOA. The uncertainties for individual cases are larger - up to 30 Wm(-2). These uncertainties need to be considered when radiation flux products from CloudSat and CALIPSO are used in climate and weather studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available