4.6 Article

Multi-Organism Composites: Combined Growth Potential of Mycelium and Bacterial Cellulose

Journal

BIOMIMETICS
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biomimetics7020055

Keywords

mycelium; bacterial cellulose; biocompatibility; knitted fabric; material tinkering

Funding

  1. Research England's Expanding Excellence in England (E3) Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The paper investigates the compatibility of mycelium and bacterial cellulose as biomaterials for large-scale biohybrid structure development. It shows that under optimal conditions, these biomaterials can grow together and create composites with a wide range of functions. However, there are still challenges that need to be addressed during the fabrication process.
The demand for sustainable materials derived from renewable resources has led to significant research exploring the performance and functionality of biomaterials such as mycelium and bacterial cellulose. Whilst the growing conditions and performance of individual biomaterials are understood, to achieve additional new and enhanced functionality, an understanding of how biomaterials can be used together as composites and hybrids is required. This paper investigates the compatibility of mycelium and bacterial cellulose as two biomaterials with different qualities for the development of a large-scale biohybrid structure, the BioKnit prototype. Their compatibility was tested through preliminary design experiments and a material tinkering approach. The findings demonstrate that under optimal conditions mycelium and bacterial cellulose can grow in each other's presence and create composites with an extensive array of functions. However, there is a need to develop further fabrication settings that help to maintain optimal growing conditions and nutrition levels, whilst eliminating problems such as contamination and competition during growth.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available