4.6 Article

Seismic Fragility Analysis of Mega-Frame with Vibration Control Substructure Based on Dual Surrogate Model and Active Learning

Journal

BUILDINGS
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/buildings12060752

Keywords

seismic fragility analysis; dual surrogate model; Kriging model; active learning; mega-frame with vibration control substructure

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51078311]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes an improved DSM-based seismic fragility analysis method using active learning, which enhances computational efficiency and accuracy by optimizing surrogate models and design of experiments. The numerical example verifies the effectiveness and feasibility of the method, showing that MFVCS has better seismic performance.
Seismic fragility analysis of a mega-frame with vibration control substructure (MFVCS) considering structural uncertainties is computationally expensive. Dual surrogate model (DSM) can be used to improve computational efficiency, whereas the proper selection of design of experiments (DoE) is a difficult work in the DSM-based seismic fragility analysis (DSM-SFA) method. To efficiently assess the seismic fragility with sufficient accuracy, this paper proposes an improved DSM-SFA method based on active learning (AL). In this method, the Kriging model is employed for surrogate modeling to obtain the predicted error of approximation. An AL sampling strategy is presented to update the DoE adaptively, and the refinement of the surrogate models can reduce the error of the probability result computed by the Monte Carlo (MC) simulation. A numerical example was studied to verify the effectiveness and feasibility of the improved procedure. This method was applied to the fragility analysis of an MFVCS and a mega-frame structure (MFS). The finite element models were established using OpenSeesPy and SAP2000 software, respectively, and the correctness of the MFVCS model was verified. The results show that MFVCS is less vulnerable than MFS and has better seismic performance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available