4.7 Article

Artemisinin protects human retinal pigment epithelial cells from hydrogen peroxide-induced oxidative damage through activation of ERK/CREB signaling

Journal

REDOX BIOLOGY
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages 50-56

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.redox.2016.06.002

Keywords

Retinal pigment epithelial cells; Age-related macular degeneration; Artemisinin; ROS; ERK

Funding

  1. Guangdong Provincial Project of Science and Technology [2011B050200005]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31371088]
  3. University of Macau [SRG2015-00004-FHS, MYRG2016-00052-FHS]
  4. Science and Technology Development Fund (FDCT) of Macao [FDCT 021/2015/A1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The pathological increase in the levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), is implicated in the development of age-related macular degeneration (AMD). The discovery of drug candidates to effectively protect RPE cells from oxidative damage is required to resolve the pathological aspects and modify the process of AMD. In this study, a FDA-approved anti-malaria drug, Artemisinin was found to suppress hydrogen peroxide (H2O2)-induced cell death in human RPE cell D407 cells. Further study showed that Artemisinin significantly suppressed H2O2-induced D407 cell death by restoring abnormal changes in nuclear morphology, intracellular ROS, mitochondria) membrane potential and apoptotic biomarkers. Western blotting analysis showed that Artemisinin was able to activate extracellular regulated ERK/CREB survival signaling. Furthermore, Artemisinin failed to suppress H2O2-induced cytotoxicity and the increase of caspase 3/7 activity in the presence of the ERK inhibitor PD98059. Taken together, these results suggest that Artemisinin is a potential protectant with the pro survival effects against H2O2 insult through activation of the ERK/CREB pathway. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available