4.7 Article

Effects of high fat diets on rodent liver bioenergetics and oxidative imbalance

Journal

REDOX BIOLOGY
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages 216-225

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.redox.2016.01.009

Keywords

Mitochondria; High fat diets; Liver; Metabolic diseases

Funding

  1. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [2010/51906-1]
  2. Centro de Pesquisa, Inovacao e Difusao de Processos Redox em Biomedicina [13/07937-8]
  3. Wide de Pesquisa em Processos Redox em Biomedicina (NAP-Redoxoma)
  4. Institute Nacional de Ciencia e Tecnologia de Processos Redox em Biomedicina (INCT Redoxoma)
  5. Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento (CNPq) [153560/2011-8, 302898/2013-1]
  6. FAPESP [2013/03556-0]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Human metabolic diseases can be mimicked in rodents by using dietary interventions such as high fat diets (HFD). Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) develops as a result of HFD and the disease may progress in a manner involving increased production of oxidants. The main intracellular source of these oxidants are mitochondria, which are also responsible for lipid metabolism and thus widely recognized as important players in the pathology and progression of steatosis. Here, we review publications that study redox and bioenergetic effects of HFD in the liver. We find that dietary composition and protocol implementations vary widely, as do the results of these dietary interventions. Overall, all HFD promote steatosis, changes in beta-oxidation, generation and consequences of oxidants, while effects on body weight, insulin signaling and other bioenergetic parameters are more variable with the experimental models adopted. Our review provides a broad analysis of the bioenergetic and redox changes promoted by HFD as well as suggestions for changes and specifications in methodologies that may help explain apparent disparities in the current literature. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available