4.1 Article

Assessing progression from mild to severe preeclampsia in expectantly managed preterm parturients

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.preghy.2016.08.230

Keywords

Preeclampsia; Expectant management; Hypertension; Systolic blood pressure; Latency period

Funding

  1. MemorialCare Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To identify factors associated with shortened latency in expectantly managed women diagnosed with preeclampsia without severe features between 23 0/7 and 35 6/7 weeks' gestation. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study performed at a large community-based hospital between 2009 and 2014, evaluating all mothers between 23 OP and 35 6/7 weeks' gestation with a diagnosis of preeclampsia without severe features. We collected maternal demographics, symptoms, vital signs and laboratory values within six hours of admission. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were stratified by latency period of less than or greater than/equal to seven days (<7 d or >= 7 d). Results: Overall mean latency was 7.6 +/- 12.1 days. When stratifying subjects to <7 d or >= 7 d latency, neither maternal demographics nor gestational age at diagnosis differed between groups. For subjects with >= 7 d latency, pregnancy was prolonged by a mean of 24 days compared to the <7 d latency group (34 1/7 vs 30 4/7 weeks GA, P = 0.001). Systolic blood pressure greater than 160 mmHg within the first six hours of hospital presentation correlated with a more than 3-fold risk for requiring delivery within seven days of diagnosis (OR 3.26 95% CI 1.40-7.58). Conclusion: Within our cohort of preterm women admitted with preeclampsia without severe features, elevated systolic blood pressure on admission conveyed significant risk for delivery within seven days. (C) 2016 International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available