4.7 Article

MRI evaluation of soft tissue tumors: comparison of a fast, isotropic, 3D T2-weighted fat-saturated sequence with a conventional 2D T2-weighted fat-saturated sequence for tumor characteristics, resolution, and acquisition time

Journal

EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
Volume 32, Issue 12, Pages 8670-8680

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-08937-7

Keywords

CAIPIRINHA; Magnetic resonance imaging; Soft tissue tumors; SPACE; Three-dimensional

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study demonstrates that a 4-fold accelerated 3D T2-weighted CAIPIRINHA SPACE TSE sequence is equivalent to conventional 2DT2 TSE sequence for evaluating soft tissue tumor characteristics. The 3DT2 MRI offers higher spatial resolution and shorter acquisition times compared to 2DT2 MRI, making it interchangeable in tumor protocols.
Objectives To test whether a 4-fold accelerated 3D T2-weighted (T2) CAIPIRINHA SPACE TSE sequence with isotropic voxel size is equivalent to conventional 2DT2 TSE for the evaluation of intrinsic and perilesional soft tissue tumors (STT) characteristics. Methods For 108 patients with histologically-proven STTs, MRI, including 3DT2 (CAIPIRINHA SPACE TSE) and 2DT2 (TSE) sequences, was performed. Two radiologists evaluated each sequence for quality (diagnostic, non-diagnostic), tumor characteristics (heterogeneity, signal intensity, margin), and the presence or absence of cortical involvement, marrow edema, and perilesional edema (PLE); tumor size and PLE extent were measured. Signal-to-noise (SNR) and contrast-to-noise (CNR) ratios and acquisition times for 2DT2 in two planes and 3DT2 sequences were reported. Descriptive statistics and inter-method agreement were reported. Results Image quality was diagnostic for all sequences (100% [108/108]). No difference was observed between 3DT2 and 2DT2 tumor characteristics (p < 0.05). There was no difference in mean tumor size (3DT2: 2.9 +/- 2.5 cm, 2DT2: 2.8 +/- 2.6 cm, p = 0.4) or PLE extent (3DT2:0.5 +/- 1.2 cm, 2DT2:0.5 +/- 1.0 cm, p = 0.9) between the sequences. There was no difference in the SNR of tumors, marrow, and fat between the sequences, whereas the SNR of muscle was higher (p < 0.05) on 3DT2 than 2DT2. CNR measures on 3DT2 were similar to 2DT2 (p > 0.1). The average acquisition time was shorter for 3DT2 compared with 2DT2 (343 +/- 127 s vs 475 +/- 162 s, respectively). Conclusion Isotropic 3DT2 MRI offers higher spatial resolution, faster acquisition times, and equivalent assessments of STT characteristics compared to conventional 2DT2 MRI in two planes. 3DT2 is interchangeable with a 2DT2 sequence in tumor protocols.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available