4.5 Review

Efficacy of Methylprednisolone Compared to Other Drugs for Pain, Swelling, and Trismus Control after Third Molar Surgery: A Meta-Analysis

Journal

HEALTHCARE
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10061028

Keywords

methylprednisolone; non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; postoperative pain; trismus; third molar surgery

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of methylprednisolone compared to other drugs in controlling postoperative complications following third molar surgery. Qualitative analysis showed that methylprednisolone was more effective than NSAIDs, but inferior to dexamethasone. Quantitative analysis showed no statistical difference in pain control, but a significant difference in trismus evaluation in favor of methylprednisolone on the 7th postoperative day.
The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy of methylprednisolone compared to other drugs to control postoperative complications following third molar surgery. PubMed and Google Scholar were used for article searching. Thereafter, the trials meeting the selection criteria and with high methodological quality, according to the Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool, were included in this study. The inverse variance test and mean difference using the Review Manager Software 5.3 for Windows were used to carry out data analysis. Qualitative analysis shows that methylprednisolone is more effective than NSAIDs, but inferior to dexamethasone, for controlling postoperative complications after third molar removal. The quantitative analysis showed no statistical difference for pain control, while trismus evaluation showed a statistical difference after 7 postoperative days in favor of methylprednisolone, when compared to other drugs. In conclusion, methylprednisolone was more effective for trismus control compared to other drugs after lower third molar surgery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available