4.7 Article

Probabilistic Risk Assessment in Space Launches Using Bayesian Network with Fuzzy Method

Journal

AEROSPACE
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/aerospace9060311

Keywords

probability risk assessment; Bayesian network; fuzzy method; space launch system

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [72071011]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes a risk analysis framework based on Bayesian network with fuzzy method for probabilistic risk analysis of space launch systems (SLSs), aiming to reduce the uncertainty of the model and effectively deal with the uncertainties in the field of space launches. The method establishes a risk analysis model of SLS based on statistics and expert experience and provides guidance for similar engineering projects through a case study of space launches.
Space launch projects are extremely risky, and any equipment failure or human error may lead to disastrous consequences. Probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) is beneficial to qualitative analysis of risk, but it has not been paid enough attention in risk analysis for space launch systems (SLSs). Compared with most qualitative risk analysis in this field, this paper proposes a risk analysis framework based on Bayesian network (BN) with fuzzy method, which is suitable for probabilistic risk analysis of SLS. This method establishes a risk analysis model of SLS based on statistics and expert experience and reduces the uncertainty of the model by using fuzzy theory. By predicting the system risk probabilities, diagnosing the key risk causes, determining the risk conduction path, and performing a sensitivity analysis, the proposed risk analysis framework is aimed at alleviating this drawback to deal more effectively with the uncertainties in the field of space launches. A case study of space launches demonstrates and verifies the proposed method, and it also provides guidance for similar engineering projects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available