4.7 Article

Bessel-Gauss photon beams with fractional order vortex propagation in weak non-Kolmogorov turbulence

Journal

PHOTONICS RESEARCH
Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages 30-34

Publisher

OPTICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1364/PRJ.4.000030

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China [BK20140128]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of Special Theoretical Physics [11447174]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [JUSRP51517]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We model the effects of weak fluctuations on the probability densities and normalized powers of vortex models for the Bessel-Gauss photon beam with fractional topological charge in the paraxial non-Kolmogorov turbulence channel. We find that probability density of signal vortex models is a function of deviation from the center of the photon beam, and the farther away from the beam center it is, the smaller the probability density is. For fractional topological charge, the average probability densities of signal/crosstalk vortex modes oscillate along the beam radius except the half-integer order. As the beam waist of the photon source grows, the average probability density of signal and crosstalk vortex modes grow together. Moreover, the peak of the average probability density of crosstalk vortex modes shifts outward from the beam center as the beam waist gets larger. The results also show that the smaller index of non-Kolmogorov turbulence and the smaller generalized refractive-index structure parameter may lead to the higher average probability densities of signal vortex modes and lower average probability densities of crosstalk vortex modes. Lower-coherence radius or beam waist can give rise to less reduction of the normalized powers of the signal vortex modes, which is opposite to the normalized powers of crosstalk vortex modes. (C) 2016 Chinese Laser Press

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available