4.6 Article

Tissue-engineered composite tracheal grafts create mechanically stable and biocompatible airway replacements

Journal

JOURNAL OF TISSUE ENGINEERING
Volume 13, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/20417314221108791

Keywords

Composite tracheal graft; partially decellularized tracheal scaffold; 3D-printed splint; tracheal collapse; tissue regeneration

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH NHLBI) [NIH NHLBI K08HL138460, NIH NHLBI R01HL157039]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study tested composite tracheal grafts consisting of a partially decellularized tracheal graft combined with a 3-dimensional-printed airway splint for long-segment airway reconstruction. The findings showed that the composite grafts had stable mechanical properties, were easily implanted without adverse reactions or tracheal collapse, and demonstrated comparable results in epithelialization and endothelialization compared to the control group.
We tested composite tracheal grafts (CTG) composed of a partially decellularized tracheal graft (PDTG) combined with a 3-dimensional (3D)-printed airway splint for use in long-segment airway reconstruction. CTG is designed to recapitulate the 3D extracellular matrix of the trachea with stable mechanical properties imparted from the extraluminal airway splint. We performed segmental orthotopic tracheal replacement in a mouse microsurgical model. MicroCT was used to measure graft patency. Tracheal neotissue formation was quantified histologically. Airflow dynamic properties were analyzed using computational fluid dynamics. We found that CTG are easily implanted and did not result in vascular erosion, tracheal injury, or inflammation. Graft epithelialization and endothelialization were comparable with CTG to control. Tracheal collapse was absent with CTG. Composite tracheal scaffolds combine biocompatible synthetic support with PDTG, supporting the regeneration of host epithelium while maintaining graft structure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available