4.3 Article

Endemicity Analysis of the Ichtyofauna of the Rio Doce Basin, Southeastern Brazil

Journal

ANAIS DA ACADEMIA BRASILEIRA DE CIENCIAS
Volume 94, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

ACAD BRASILEIRA DE CIENCIAS
DOI: 10.1590/0001-3765202220210646

Keywords

Fish; conservation; Endemism; biogeography; Atlantic Forest

Funding

  1. CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico, Brazil)
  2. CONICET (Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas, Argentina)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The paper studied the biodiversity of the Rio Doce freshwater system in Brazil before the environmental damage caused by the bursting of the Fundao tailing dam in 2015. It identified several areas of endemism and highlighted information gaps in fish sampling. The findings can contribute to understanding the impact on fish biodiversity and guide restoration efforts.
The Rio Doce is a very important freshwater system in Brazil running through the Atlantic Forest, however available information about its biodiversity is scarce. In 2015, the Rio Doce basin was damaged by a burst of Fundao tailing dam in Mariana (Minas Gerais) causing an extraordinary environmental damage, with consequences still incompletely known. In the present paper we analyzed 6042 latitude/longitude records of 208 fish species from the Rio Doce deposited in collections prior to November 2015, in order to identify areas of endemism in the river before the burst. Several areas of endemism were identified along the basin, most of them describing small and novel patterns. Our analyses helped to identify areas of major diversity along the basin as well as information gaps concerning fish sampling. We hope this contribution will help obtaining quantitative measures on the impact caused by the Fundao dam catastrophe on fish biodiversity and will be useful to orient general actions towards the restoration of the basin.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available