4.6 Article

An Experimental Study of Carbon-Doped GaN via Solid-Gas Reaction Route and Investigation of Its Defect-Related Luminescence

Journal

ACS APPLIED ELECTRONIC MATERIALS
Volume 4, Issue 6, Pages 3147-3153

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsaelm.2c00619

Keywords

impurities; nitrides; gallium nitride; doped gallium nitride; solid-state reaction; defects; materials

Funding

  1. DST
  2. JNCASR

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Carbon-doped gallium nitride is a promising material for optoelectronic devices, and studying its defects can provide insights into possible transitions. Carbon-doped GaN was obtained through a simple solid-gas reaction. Spectroscopic analysis revealed the presence of an isolated C-N defect state and the formation of a C-N-O-N complex. In heavily doped samples, blue luminescence related to oxygen defects was quenched, and carbon-related yellow luminescence appeared.
Carbon-doped gallium nitride (GaN) is a very interesting material with applications in optoelectronic devices, and studies related to their defects offer insights regarding possible transitions based on the nature of the defects. A simple solid-gas reaction route has yielded carbon-doped GaN. An isolated C-N defect state has been observed by spectroscopic tools (Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy) along with the C-N-O-N complex formation. In addition to the red shift in the fundamental absorption band, a transition band was observed at similar to 3.05 eV. A complete quenching of blue luminescence (BL) related to an oxygen defect and the appearance of a carbon-related yellow luminescence (YL) is shown in strongly doped samples. The origin of this defect-related YL in C-doped GaN is attributed to the carbon-defect C-N (-1 charged) level transitions confirmed by absorption energy, photoluminescence (PL) peak position, and zero-phonon line.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available