4.1 Article

Small bowel intussusception and concurrent jejunal polyp with neoplastic transformation: a new diagnosis of Peutz-Jeghers syndrome

Journal

ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND
Volume 104, Issue 3, Pages E84-E86

Publisher

ROYAL COLL SURGEONS ENGLAND
DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2021.0142

Keywords

Abdominal pain; Per rectum bleeding; Intussusception; Polyp; Peutz-Jeghers; Dysplasia; Neoplasm

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report a case of a 27-year-old man with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome who presented with intussusception. Histology from surgical specimens revealed Peutz-Jeghers polyps, one of which had low-grade dysplasia. This case highlights the rare possibility of intussusception in adults with PJS.
Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (PJS) is a rare hereditary disease characterised by hyperpigmentation of the oral mucosa and gastrointestinal hamartomatous polyps. We report a case of a 27-year-old man who presented with a 5-day history of epigastric pain and rectal bleeding. Computed tomography suggested small bowel obstruction secondary to ileocolic intussusception and an incidental polyp in the mid jejunum. The patient underwent exploratory laparotomy during which right hemicolectomy and small bowel resection were performed. Histology from surgical specimens revealed Peutz-Jeghers polyps, one of which had low-grade dysplasia. This case emphasises that although rare, adults with PJS can present with intussusception. Also illustrated is the extremely rare possibility of concurrent polyps occurring in different parts of the bowel with neoplastic transformation. Intussusception is a challenge to diagnose because the presentation is often non-specific. Clinical history-taking and physical examination along with prompt axial imaging is important for the diagnosis. Careful examination of the bowel and polypectomy during laparotomy may prevent neoplastic transformation and short bowel syndrome.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available