4.7 Article

Carbon dioxide intensity of GDP and environmental degradation in an emerging country

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
Volume 29, Issue 56, Pages 84451-84459

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-21679-9

Keywords

CO2 intensity of GDP; Environmental degradation; Turkey; Nonlinear models; Linear models

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper investigates the impact of carbon dioxide intensity of GDP on environmental degradation in Turkey, and finds that a decrease in carbon dioxide intensity can reduce environmental degradation. Additionally, economic growth is the primary factor for environmental sustainability in Turkey.
This paper investigates whether the carbon dioxide (CO2) intensity of GDP matters for environmental degradation in an emerging country, namely, Turkey, over the period of 1990-2018 while controlling economic growth, foreign direct investment, and renewable energy consumption. The present study uses both linear and nonlinear time series estimators, namely, the Gregory and Hansen cointegration test, bounds test, nonlinear autoregressive distributed lag (NARDL) model, fully modified ordinary least squares (FMOLS), dynamic ordinary least squares (DOLS), and canonical cointegrating regressions (CCR), to encapsulate the possible effect of CO2 intensity of GDP, economic growth, foreign direct investment, and renewable energy consumption on environmental degradation in Turkey. The empirical finding of the present study reveals that the CO2 intensity of GDP is an important factor to determine environmental degradation in Turkey and the declining CO2 intensity of GDP reduces environmental degradation. Moreover, economic growth is the primary environmental sustainability factor in Turkey. The result is vital for policymaking and can perhaps be applied to take decisive policy actions to mitigate environmental issues.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available