4.5 Article

Machine learning modeling and DOE-assisted optimization in synthesis of nanosilica particles via Stober method

Journal

ADVANCES IN NANO RESEARCH
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages 387-403

Publisher

TECHNO-PRESS
DOI: 10.12989/anr.2022.12.4.387

Keywords

design of experiments (DOE); machine learning; nanoparticles; silica; Stober method

Funding

  1. Korea Enivronment Inustry & Technology Institute, Republic of Korea [2020002470002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study synthesized monodispersed silica nanoparticles directly from TEOS using the sol-gel process and the Stober method. By optimizing the process with a central composite design, the smallest particle size and lowest TEOS concentration were achieved. The results showed that the predicted optimization was consistent with experimental procedures and the model was significant at a 95% confidence level.
Silica nanoparticles, which have a broad range of sizes and specific surface features, have been used in many industrial applications. This study was conducted to synthesize monodispersed silica nanoparticles directly from tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) with an alkaline catalyst (NH3) based on the sol-gel process and the Stober method. A central composite design (CCD) is used to build a second-order (quadratic) model for the response variables without requiring a complete three-level factorial experiment. The process was then optimized to achieve the minimum particle size with the lowest concentration of TEOS. Dynamic light scattering and scanning electron microscopy were used to analyze the size, dispersity, and morphology of the synthesized nanoparticles. After optimization, a confirmation test was carried out to evaluate the confidence level of the software prediction. The results revealed that the predicted optimization is consistent with experimental procedures, and the model is significant at the 95% confidence level.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available