4.7 Article

Axion quality problem alleviated by nonminimal coupling to gravity

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 105, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.105.076008

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. JSPS [21J20445]
  2. [19H05810]
  3. [19H05802]
  4. [18H05542]
  5. [20H01897]
  6. [21K13916]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Global symmetries are expected to be violated by gravity, but a new coupling method can suppress the breaking effect in the presence of gravity, maintaining high-quality symmetry. This provides a new way to avoid the mass problem of global symmetries.
Global symmetries are expected to be violated by gravity, which may cause a serious problem to models based on these symmetries. A famous example is the Peccei-Quinn solution to the strong CP problem in QCD axion models; it requires a global U(1) symmetry to be respected with high quality, and even the Planck-scale suppressed operators that violate the U(1) symmetry would spoil this solution. Indeed, it is known that gravitational instantons do break the U(1) Peccei-Quinn symmetry and induce the U(1)-violating operators, bringing back the strong CP problem to the axion models. This conclusion is, however, highly dependent on the structure of the theory around the Planck scale and, therefore, may be evaded if we go beyond the minimal setup. In this paper, we study the effect of a nonminimal coupling of the Peccei-Quinn field to gravity, xi, on the gravitational instanton effect. This setup is frequently considered in cosmology as it can realize a successful inflation if xi less than or similar to 10(5). We find that the U(1)-breaking effect of the gravitational instantons can sufficiently be suppressed for xi greater than or similar to 2 x 10(3), which suggests that the U(1) symmetry may be maintained with high quality even in the presence of gravity. Our result thus points to a new way to avoid the quality problem of global symmetries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available