4.6 Article

PD-L1 peptide co-stimulation increases immunogenicity of a dendritic cell-based cancer vaccine

Journal

ONCOIMMUNOLOGY
Volume 5, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/2162402X.2016.1202391

Keywords

Anti-tregs; antigen; B7-H1; CD274; co-stimulation; dendritic cell-based vaccine; melanoma; PD-L1; T cells

Funding

  1. Danish Cancer Society
  2. Lundbeck foundation
  3. Danish Council for Independent Research
  4. Herlev 395 Hospital
  5. The Danish Cancer Society [R72-A4460, R132-A8399] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We recently described naturally occurring PD-L1-specific T cells that recognize PD-L1-expressing immune cells as well as malignant cells. In the present study, we investigated whether the immunogenicity of a dendritic cell (DC)-based vaccine could be influenced by co-stimulation with a known PD-L1-derived epitope. We incubated a PD-L1-derived peptide epitope (19 amino acids long) or a control peptide (an irrelevant HIV epitope) with peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients with malignant melanoma who had received a DC-based vaccine. We observed a significantly higher number of T cells that reacted to the vaccine in cultures that had been co-stimulated with the PD-L1 peptide epitope compared to cultures incubated with control peptide. Next, we characterized a novel PD-L1-derived epitope (23 amino acids long) and found that co-stimulation with both PD-L1 epitopes boosted the immune response elicited by the DC vaccine even further. Consequently, we observed a significant increase in the number of vaccine-reacting T cells in vitro. In conclusion, activation of PD-L1-specific T cells may directly modulate immunogenicity of DC vaccines. Addition of PD-L1 epitopes may thus be an easily applicable and attractive option to augment the effectiveness of cancer vaccines and other immunotherapeutic agents.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available