4.0 Article

Optimizing Obsessive-Compulsive Symptom Measurement With the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scales-Second Edition

Journal

JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC PRACTICE
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages 294-309

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/PRA.0000000000000640

Keywords

obsessive-compulsive disorder; Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale; symptom severity; avoidance; treatment; assessment; reliability; validity

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) [1UH3NS100549-01]
  2. National Institute of Mental Health [1RF1MH121371]
  3. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development of the National Institutes of Health [P50HD103555]
  4. NIH
  5. McNair Foundation
  6. Biohaven Pharmaceuticals
  7. Ream Foundation
  8. Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board
  9. Greater Houston Community Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale-Second Edition (Y-BOCS-II) is a more comprehensive measure for assessing the severity of obsessive-compulsive disorder symptoms, especially in severely ill patients. It maintains strong consistency with the original scale when assessing patients with mild to moderate symptoms. By adding Y-BOCS item 4 and back-coding, both Y-BOCS and Y-BOCS-II scores can be obtained within one assessment, allowing for more robust data collection and comparability across studies.
The Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) is a widely used measure for assessing the presence and severity of obsessive-compulsive disorder symptoms. The Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale-Second Edition (Y-BOCS-II) was developed, in part, to more comprehensively evaluate symptom severity, especially in extremely ill patients, and improve consistency in detecting and incorporating avoidance behaviors. We present 3 case studies that demonstrate the enhanced ability of the Y-BOCS-II to: (1) detect fluctuations in symptom severity among extremely ill patients, (2) systematically incorporate avoidance variables for more accurate ratings, and (3) maintain strong convergence with the Y-BOCS in assessing patients presenting with mild to moderate symptoms. In addition, we outline how to obtain both Y-BOCS and Y-BOCS-II scores within 1 administration by adding Y-BOCS item 4 to the Y-BOCS-II assessment, then back-coding the Y-BOCS-II ratings to Y-BOCS ratings and using Y-BOCS item 4 in place of Y-BOCS-II item 2. The use of this method allows for more robust data collection while providing comparability across the literature.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available