4.6 Article

Stiffening of under-constrained spring networks under isotropic strain

Journal

SOFT MATTER
Volume 18, Issue 29, Pages 5410-5425

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2sm00075j

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. French Government [ANR-16-CONV-0001]
  2. Excellence Initiative of Aix-Marseille University - A*MIDEX

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study numerically investigates the elastic behavior of spring networks and predicts the scaling behavior related to rigidity transition. The results indicate that the predictions apply to various classes of spring networks and there is a linear scaling relationship between shear modulus and stress.
Disordered spring networks are a useful paradigm to examine macroscopic mechanical properties of amorphous materials. Here, we study the elastic behavior of under-constrained spring networks, i.e. networks with more degrees of freedom than springs. While such networks are usually floppy, they can be rigidified by applying external strain. Recently, an analytical formalism has been developed to predict the scaling behavior of the elastic network properties close to this rigidity transition. Here we numerically show that these predictions apply to many different classes of spring networks, including phantom triangular, Delaunay, Voronoi, and honeycomb networks. The analytical predictions further imply that the shear modulus G scales linearly with isotropic stress T close to the rigidity transition. However, this seems to be at odds with recent numerical studies suggesting an exponent between G and T that is smaller than one for some network classes. Using increased numerical precision and shear stabilization, we demonstrate here that close to the transition a linear scaling, G similar to T, holds independent of the network class. Finally, we show that our results are not or only weakly affected by finite-size effects, depending on the network class.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available