4.5 Article

Wear behavior and abrasiveness of monolithic CAD/CAM ceramics after simulated mastication

Journal

CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS
Volume 26, Issue 11, Pages 6593-6605

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-022-04611-w

Keywords

Wear; Dental ceramics; CAD; CAM; Volumetric enamel loss; Surface roughness; Micro-CT

Funding

  1. Missions Department of the Egyptian Higher Ministry of Education

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the wear resistance and abrasiveness of monolithic CAD/CAM ceramics. The results showed that monolithic zirconia demonstrated the best wear resistance and least abrasiveness to the antagonist. The experimental lithium disilicate was more wear-resistant compared to other glass-ceramic groups.
Objectives To evaluate the wear resistance and abrasiveness of monolithic CAD/CAM ceramics. Materials and methods Rectangular-shaped specimens (12 mm x 6.5 mm x 1.5 mm) were sectioned from the following CAD/CAM blocks (n = 10); partially crystallized lithium disilicate (PLD), experimental fully crystallized lithium disilicate (FLD), zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (ZLS), super-translucent monolithic zirconia (SMZ), and ultra-translucent monolithic zirconia (UMZ). Silicon carbide papers were used to mechanically flatten and polish the surfaces. PLD specimens were subjected to a combined crystallization/glazing firing cycle. Ceramic specimens were mounted to the wear device and tested for 200,000 cycles against human premolars at 20 N force and 2 mm sliding distance. Artificial saliva was used as a lubricant. The teeth were scanned using micro-CT before and after the wear test and the generated models were overlapped to determine the volumetric tooth loss. Before and after the test, specimens' weights and surface roughness (R-a) values were measured, and the differences were calculated. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) were utilized for microstructural and chemical analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA or an equivalent test for non-parametric results. Significance level was set at P <= 0.05. Results The type of ceramic material affected the ceramic and antagonist wear rates (P < 0.001). PLD and ZLS had the highest ceramic and antagonist wear, whereas UMZ and SMZ demonstrated the lowest wear values. The FLD group showed comparable antagonist wear and significantly less ceramic wear than PLD and ZLS. Conclusions Monolithic zirconia demonstrated the best wear resistance and least abrasiveness to the antagonist. The experimental lithium disilicate was more wear-resistant than other glass-ceramic groups.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available