4.6 Article

Anti-Poiseuille flow: Increased vortex velocity at superconductor edges

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
Volume 105, Issue 22, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.105.224512

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) [RTG 1995]
  2. Germany's Excellence Strategy-Cluster of Excellence Matter and Light for Quantum Computing (ML4Q) [EXC 2004/1-390534769]
  3. Center for Precision-Assembled Quantum Materials P (AQM) [DMR-2011738]
  4. RWTH Aachen University [rwth0601, rwth0507]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using the time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau equations, the study investigates vortex motion driven by an applied current in two-dimensional superconductors with a physical boundary. The results show that the vortex lattice exhibits different motion patterns, including collective movement, channeling, and stick-slip motion, depending on the magnitude of the sourced current.
Using the time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau equations, we study vortex motion driven by an applied current in two-dimensional superconductors in the presence of a physical boundary. At smaller sourced currents the vortex lattice moves as a whole, with each vortex moving at the same velocity. At the larger sourced current, the vortex motion is organized into channels, with vortices in channels closer to the sample edges moving faster than those farther away from sample edges, opposite the Poiseuille flow of basic hydrodynamics in which the velocity is lowest at the boundaries. At intermediate currents, a stick-slip motion of the vortex lattice occurs in which vortices in the channel at the boundary break free from the Abrikosov lattice, accelerate, move past their neighbors, and then slow down and reattach to the vortex lattice, at which point the stick-slip process starts over. These effects could be observed experimentally, e.g., using fast scanning microscopy techniques.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available