Journal
LANCET HAEMATOLOGY
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages E228-E236Publisher
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/s2352-3026(16)00023-5
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- Daiichi Sankyo
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background There are few data on the relative efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants, such as edoxaban, compared with vitamin K antagonists during extended therapy for venous thromboembolism. This analysis evaluates the risk benefit of extended treatment for up to 12 months with edoxaban compared with warfarin among patients enrolled in the Hokusai-VTE study who continued therapy beyond 3 months. Methods The Hokusai-VTE trial (NCT00986154) was a randomised, double-blind, event driven non-inferiority trial in 8292 patients comparing edoxaban with warfarin in the treatment of patients with acute venous thromboembolism. All patients were treated for at least 3 months and treatment was continued for up to 12 months. The outcomes at 12 months were documented in all patients irrespective of treatment duration. 3633 patients treated with edoxaban and 3594 treated with warfarin who completed 3 months of treatment were eligible for this analysis. The primary efficacy outcome was the incidence of adjudicated symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism evaluated for each of the time intervals of 3 months, greater than 3 months to 6 months, greater than 6 months to less than 12 months, and at 12 months, as well as the cumulative incidence occurring between 3 and 12 months. The principal safety outcome was the incidence of clinically relevant bleeding (composite of major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding). Both on-treatment and intention-to-treat analyses were done. Findings In the on-treatment analysis, the incidence of recurrent venous thromboembolism at 3 months was 1.1% (0.8-1.4; 44 of 4118 patients) in the edoxaban-treated group versus 1.2% (0.9-1.6; 51 of 4122) in the warfarin-treated group; between greater than 3 months and 6 months, 0.7% (0.3-1.5; eight of 1076) versus 0.5% (0.2-1.1; five of 1084); between greater than 6 months and less than 12 months, 0.2% (0.0-0.8; two of 896) versus 0.8% (0.03-1.7; seven of 851); and at 12 months, <0.1% (0.0-0.3; one of 1661) versus 0.1% (0.0-0.4; two of 1659). In the on-treatment analysis, the cumulative incidence of recurrent venous thromboembolism between 3 and 12 months was 0.3% (95% CI 0.2-1.5; 11 of 3633 patients) in the edoxaban-treated group and 0.4% (0.2-1.7; 14 of 3594) in the warfarin-treated group (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.36-1.72). The cumulative incidence of clinically relevant bleeding (major or non-major) between 3 and 12 months was 3.9% (95% CI 3.3-4.6; 143 of 3633 patients) in the edoxaban-treated group and 4.1% (3.5-4.8; 147 of 3594 patients) in the warfarin-treated group (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.77-1.22); cumulative incidence of major bleeding was 0.3% (95% CI 0.2-0.5; 11 of 3633 patients) in the edoxaban-treated group and 0.7% (0.4-1.0; 24 of 3594 patients) in the warfarin-treated group (HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.22-0.92). Similar results were obtained in the intention-to-treat analysis. Interpretation Extended treatment with edoxaban is effective and associated with less major bleeding than warfarin. Edoxaban once daily provides an attractive alternative to warfarin for patients with venous thromboembolism who require extended treatment for prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available