3.8 Article

Optimizing the Multi-Level Location-Assignment Problem in Queue Networks Using a Multi-Objective Optimization Approach

Journal

FOUNDATIONS OF COMPUTING AND DECISION SCIENCES
Volume 47, Issue 2, Pages 177-192

Publisher

SCIENDO
DOI: 10.2478/fcds-2022-0010

Keywords

Location-Assignment; Hub; Reinforced Epsilon Constraint Method; Multilevel Services; Queue Theory; Multi-Objective Optimization

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A location-allocation problem model is proposed in this paper to reduce waiting time and unemployment probability. The accurate solution of the epsilon constraint method is used for solving, and sensitivity analysis is performed.
Using hubs in distribution networks is an efficient approach. In this paper, a model for the location-allocation problem is designed within the framework of the queuing network in which services have several levels, and customers must go through these levels to complete the service. The purpose of the model is to locate an appropriate number of facilities among potential locations and allocate customers. The model is presented as a multi-objective nonlinear mixed-integer programming model. The objective functions include the summation of the customer and the waiting time in the system and the waiting time in the system and minimizing the maximum possibility of unemployment in the facility. To solve the model, the technique of accurate solution of the epsilon constraint method is used for multi-objective optimization, and Pareto solutions of the problem will be calculated. Moreover, the sensitivity analysis of the problem is performed, and the results demonstrate sensitivity to customer demand rate. Based on the results obtained, it can be concluded that the proposed model is able to greatly summate the customer and the waiting time in the system and reduce the maximum probability of unemployment at several levels of all facilities. The model can also be further developed by choosing vehicles for each customer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available