4.8 Review

Is enzyme immobilization a mature discipline? Some critical considerations to capitalize on the benefits of immobilization

Journal

CHEMICAL SOCIETY REVIEWS
Volume 51, Issue 15, Pages 6251-6290

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2cs00083k

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion-Spanish Government [CTQ2017-86170-R]
  2. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union 2020 Research and Innovation Programme [101021024]
  3. Government of Community of Madrid [2018-T1/BIO-10200]
  4. UCM-Santander [PR108/20]
  5. European Research Council (ERC) [101021024] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Enzyme immobilization technology has not been fully utilized yet, partly due to the improper experimental design in evaluating the technology. With the continuous developments in material science, bioprocess engineering, and protein science, enzyme immobilization remains a subject of high interest and shows promising prospects for the future.
Enzyme immobilization has been developing since the 1960s and although many industrial biocatalytic processes use the technology to improve enzyme performance, still today we are far from full exploitation of the field. One clear reason is that many evaluate immobilization based on only a few experiments that are not always well-designed. In contrast to many other reviews on the subject, here we highlight the pitfalls of using incorrectly designed immobilization protocols and explain why in many cases sub-optimal results are obtained. We also describe solutions to overcome these challenges and come to the conclusion that recent developments in material science, bioprocess engineering and protein science continue to open new opportunities for the future. In this way, enzyme immobilization, far from being a mature discipline, remains as a subject of high interest and where intense research is still necessary to take full advantage of the possibilities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available