4.6 Article

In vivo biomechanical assessment of iridial deformations and muscle contractions in human eyes

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY INTERFACE
Volume 19, Issue 192, Pages -

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2022.0108

Keywords

iris; pupil; glaucoma; digital image correlation; finite-element method

Funding

  1. NIH-NEI [R01EY031710]
  2. Georgia Research Alliance [G2021005F]
  3. Bright Focus Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study used a biometric dataset to investigate the effects of iris biomechanics on PACG. The findings showed significant radial strains in the iris during the pupillary light reflex. Finite-element modeling revealed a significant impact of sphincter muscle traction on iris deformations.
The iris is a muscular organ whose deformations can cause primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG), a leading cause of blindness. PACG risk assessment does not consider iridial biomechanical factors, despite their expected influence on iris deformations. Here, we exploited an existing biometric dataset consisting of near-infrared movies acquired during the pupillary light reflex (PLR) as a unique resource to study iris biomechanics. The PLR caused significant (greater than 100%) and essentially spatially uniform radial strains in the iris in vivo, consistent with previous findings. Inverse finite-element modelling showed that sphincter muscle tractions were ca fivefold greater than iridial stroma stiffness (range 4- to 13-fold, depending on sphincter muscle size). This muscle traction is greater than has been previously estimated, which may be due to methodological differences and/or to different patient populations in our study (European descent) versus previous studies (Asian); the latter possibility is of particular interest due to differential incidence rates of PACG in these populations. Our methodology is fast and inexpensive and may be a useful tool in understanding biomechanical factors contributing to PACG.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available