3.8 Article

DFT investigations on conformational analysis, solvation effects, reactivity studies, chemical descriptors and docking of two anti-cancerous drugs, Lenvatinib and Regorafenib

Journal

VIETNAM JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY
Volume 60, Issue 5, Pages 636-652

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/vjch.202200013

Keywords

Reactivity analysis; Lenvatinib; Regorafenib; Solvation effects

Funding

  1. Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia [PNURSP2022R13]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the solvent effects, wavefunction reactivity properties, and different chemical descriptors of two anticancer drugs, lenvatinib (LNTB) and regorafenib (RGFB, were evaluated using theoretical methods. The research discovered that both drugs exhibit nucleophilic and electrophilic attacks, as well as closed-shell interactions in different regions.
Two anticancer drugs, lenvatinib (LNTB) and regorafenib (RGFB) are evaluated for their solvent effects, wavefunction reactivity properties and different chemical descriptors by means of theoretical methods. Potential energy surface scan studies about all possible rotable bonds are performed and lowest energy conformations of LNTB and RGFB are for the torsion angles C25-C24-C29-N9 and C25-N10-C15-C21. Reactive sites are O and N, H atoms, giving nucleophilic and electrophilic attacks for both the molecules. Solvation free energies are calculated in different solvents and all solvents are suitble except heptane. Electron densities of LNTB and RGFB show that closed-shell interactions are in different regions. The intramolecular hydrogen bonds of the compounds LNTB and RGFB are found at O2-H38, Cl1-H37 & O5-H47 and F2-H38, N11-H45, O7-H35 & O7-H37, respectively. Due to anticancer activities, LNTB and RGFB are docked with different proteins which give binding affinities from -8.4 to -10.5 for RGFB and -7.9 to -10.1 kcal/mol for LNTB.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available