4.7 Article

Positivity bounds in the standard model effective field theory beyond tree level

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 105, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.105.L111901

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Spanish State Research Agency [PID2019 - 106087 GB-C21/C22]
  2. Junta de Andalucia (FEDER) [FQM 101, A-FQM-211-UGR18, P18-FR-4314]
  3. Spanish MINECO

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study focuses on four-Higgs interactions and analyzes the robustness of tree-level-derived positivity bounds on standard model effective field theory (SMEFT) operators under quantum corrections. The results suggest that departures from positivity within SMEFT do not necessarily imply the breaking of unitarity or causality, nor the presence of new light degrees of freedom. However, they do impose strong constraints on the form of certain anomalous dimensions.
Focusing on four-Higgs interactions, we analyze the robustness of tree-level-derived positivity bounds on standard model effective field theory (SMEFT) operators under quantum corrections. Among other results, we demonstrate that: (i) Even in the simplest extensions of the Standard Model, e.g., with one new scalar singlet or with a neutral triplet, some positivity bounds are strictly violated; (ii) the mixing of the dimension-eight operators under renormalization, which we compute here for the first time, can drive them out of their positivity region; (iii) the running of the dimension-eight interactions triggered by solely dimension-six terms respects the positivity bounds. Our results suggest, on one hand, that departures from positivity within the SMEFT, if ever found in the data, do not necessarily imply the breaking of unitarity or causality, nor the presence of new light degrees of freedom. On the other hand, they lead to strong constraints on the form of certain anomalous dimensions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available