3.8 Article

An alternative ranking system for biathlon pursuit races

Journal

JOURNAL OF SPORTS ANALYTICS
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages 141-148

Publisher

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/JSA-200598

Keywords

Biathlon; pursuit race; ranking system

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article introduces an alternative pursuit ranking system that is nearly independent of sprint rankings. The current and alternative rankings were compared using data from men's pursuit world cups. The alternative ranking was shown to significantly change individual pursuit rankings while maintaining smooth changes throughout the season.
Biathlon is an Olympic sport combining cross-country skiing with rifle shooting, giving a penalty for each target miss. The biathletes ran different race formats, including the pursuit race. During this race, the biathletes chase the leader with a start time identical to the result of the sprint race previously achieved. So, pursuit involves different skills (such as tactics or management of emotional pressure) that are not present during races with an interval-start procedure like sprint. Nevertheless, final pursuit rankings are strongly correlated to sprint ones, which prevents a spectacular comeback after a disappointing sprint race. We present here an alternative pursuit ranking system that is nearly decorrelated to sprint rankings. This simple ranking system is based on comparisons with previous pursuit results. The current and the alternative rankings were then compared on different pursuit rankings, using a database of 148 results from men pursuit world cups. The alternative ranking was shown to strongly modify a single pursuit ranking but these modifications were smoothed on a whole world cup season. Advantages and limitations of the alternative ranking system are discussed, paving the way to a fairer modification of the current pursuit ranking to increase surprise and suspense in biathlon pursuit races.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available