4.7 Article

Electrogeneration of H2O2 by graphite felt double coated with polytetrafluoroethylene and polydimethylsiloxane

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2022.108024

Keywords

Hydrogen peroxide; Graphite felt; PTFE; PDMS; Electro-Fenton

Funding

  1. US National Institute of Environ-mental Health Science (NIEHS) [P42ES017198]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Efficient and steady electrogeneration of H2O2 is achieved using a specially coated graphite felt cathode in a flow-through system without external oxygen supply. The PDMS coating inhibits electrowetting and extends the electrode's lifespan, though increasing PDMS content can reduce H2O2 production. The modified graphite felt exhibits high stability and performance in a neutral or alkaline environment.
Efficient and steady electrogeneration of H2O2 is a significant step in the Electro-Fenton water treatment process. This study fabricates a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) coated graphite felt cathode with a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) damp-proof coating to generate H2O2 in a flow-through system without an external oxygen supply. We evaluated the effect of PDMS content, current, flow rate, and pH on H2O2 production. PDMS coating inhibits electrowetting to extend the longevity of the modified graphite felt for electrogeneration of H2O2. However, increasing PDMS content can decrease H2O2 production due to reduction of active sites on the graphite felt. Graphite felt electrodes (surface area = 14.5 cm2) coated with 500 mg of PDMS can generate 10 mg/L of H2O2 under a flow rate of 3 mL/min with only 2 % production reduction after 24-h use. This modified graphite felt has better performance in a neutral or alkaline environment than in an acidic condition. Up to 38.5 mg/L of H2O2 will be generated at optimum current (120 mA) at the flow rate of 3 mL/min. Increasing the flow rate decreases the concentration of H2O2 in the electrolyte but enhances total production after 145 mins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available