Journal
ARCHIVES OF PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume 80, Issue 1, Pages -Publisher
BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13690-022-00928-w
Keywords
Guatemala; Food policies; Healthy food environment; INFORMAS; Food-EPI; Nutrition-related noncommunicable diseases
Categories
Funding
- International Development Research Centre -IDRC [107213-001, 107733-001]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study used the INFORMAS Food-EPI index to evaluate the implementation of healthy food environment policies in Guatemala and proposed actions for the government to accelerate their implementation. The results showed that almost all indicators of good practice had a low level of implementation in the country. The expert panel recommended 12 priority actions to tackle obesity and NCDs in Guatemala.
Background Benchmarking the implementation of healthy food environment public policies against international best practices may accelerate the government response to prevent obesity and non-communicable diseases (NCDs) in the countries. The aim of the study was to determine the extent of food environment policy implementation in Guatemala and to identify and prioritize actions for the government to accelerate their implementation. Methods The INFORMAS Healthy Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI from the International Network for Food and Obesity/NCDs Research, Monitoring and Action Support) was used. Evidence of implementation for 50 good practice indicators within the seven food policies and six infrastructure support domains was compiled, and subsequently validated by Guatemalan government officials. A national civil society expert panel on public health and nutrition performed an online assessment of the implementation of healthy food environment policies against best international practices. The level of agreement among evaluators was measured using the Gwet second order agreement coefficient (AC2). The expert panel recommended actions for each indicator during on-site workshops and those actions were prioritized by importance and achievability. Results The expert panel rated implementation at zero for 26% of the indicators, very low for 28% of indicators, low for 42%, and medium for 4% of indicators (none were rated high). Indicators at medium implementation were related to the use of evidence for developing policies and ingredient list/nutrition information panels on packaged foods. Seventy-seven actions were recommended prioritizing the top 10 for immediate action. The Gwet AC2 was 0.73 (95% CI 0.67-0.80), indicating a good concordance among experts. Conclusions In the Food-EPI of Guatemala, almost all indicators of good practice had a low or less level of implementation. The expert panel proposed 12 priority actions to accelerate policy implementation to tackle obesity and NCDs in the country.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available