4.4 Article

Glucose and glutamine metabolism-related protein expression in breast ductal carcinoma in situ

Journal

NEOPLASMA
Volume 69, Issue 3, Pages 630-+

Publisher

AEPRESS SRO
DOI: 10.4149/neo_2022_220103N3

Keywords

breast; ductal carcinoma in situ; metabolism; glucose; glutamine

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the expression of glucose and glutamine metabolism-related proteins in breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and found that it is associated with molecular subtypes and stromal features.
Glucose and glutamine metabolism is involved in important tumor mechanisms. Metabolism-related protein expression has been previously reported to predict tumor prognosis. We aimed to investigate glucose and glutamine metabolism-related protein expression and its implication in breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). A tissue microarray was prepared for 205 DCIS cases. Glucose and glutamine metabolism-related proteins were immunostained. Based on the results of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)-2, and Ki-67, DCIS was classified into the luminal type, HER-2 type, and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). DCIS stroma was classified into non-inflammatory and inflammatory types per stromal histology. DCIS (N=205) was classified into luminal type (n=112), HER-2 type (n=81), and TNBC (n=12). Hexokinase II (p=0.044), GLS (p=0.003), and SLC7A5 (p<0.001) expression rates were the highest in TNBC. Inflammatory type stroma showed higher SLC7A5 (p<0.001) and SLC7A11 (p=0.008) expression rates than non-inflammatory type stroma. In summary, DCIS demonstrated differential expression of metabolism-related proteins according to the molecular subtype and stromal features. TNBC showed the highest glucose and glutamine metabolismrelated protein expression, and inflammatory type stroma showed higher glutamine metabolism-related protein expression than non-inflammatory type stroma.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available