4.5 Review

Is Greenness Associated with Dementia? A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-analysis

Journal

CURRENT ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH REPORTS
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages 574-590

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1007/s40572-022-00365-5

Keywords

Greenness; Green space; Dementia; Cognitive impairment; NDVI; Land use

Funding

  1. Italian Ministry of Education, University, and Research
  2. UNIMORE FAR 2019, 2020 and 2021 Mission Oriented Linea FOMO-Fondazione di Modena
  3. Local Health Authority of Reggio Emilia
  4. National Institute of Health [R00AG066949]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review and meta-analysis assessed the association between environmental greenness and the risk of dementia and cognitive impairment. The findings suggested a slight inverse correlation between greenness and dementia at intermediate exposure levels, but no correlation at high levels. However, the study had some methodological limitations.
Purpose of Review We assessed the relation between environmental greenness and risk of dementia and cognitive impairment, based on a systematic review and meta-analysis up to March 30, 2022, characterizing whenever possible the shape of the association using dose-response meta-analysis. Recent Findings Twelve studies were included in this review, either using normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) or land use/cover (LU/LC) methodology to assess greenness. Comparing the highest versus lowest exposure categories of greenness assessed using the NDVI (6 studies) or LU/LC (6 studies), we found no association with dementia. Dose-response meta-analysis of the association between greenness measured by LU/LC and dementia, based on only 3 studies, indicated a U-shaped association, but estimates were imprecise. Summary Our systematic review and meta-analysis provided some evidence of a slight inverse association between greenness and dementia at intermediate exposure levels, but not at high levels. Potential methodological limitations, such as exposure misclassification and unmeasured confounding, may have affected the results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available